Jeff Jay, Will Kletter, Maite Madrazo, Josh Novacheck, Rory Pulvino
Kathryn Newhouse, Angela Wan, RN, Sarah Wightman
Claire Matucheski, Julia Ruedig, Kristine Schantz, Jacob Talbot
Kelsea Ballantyne, Charlise Randall & Dan Tish
A review of the University of Michigan's Campus Sustainability Integrated Assessment and Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program.
Our Annual Progress Report summarizes key successes of the Graham Sustainability Institute from September 2013 through August 2014 in three core areas: Transitional Science, Transformative Learning, and Campus Leadership.
With seed funding from U-M’s Dow Distinguished Awards for Interdisciplinary Sustainability Program, Elizabeth "Lizzie" Grobbel is using a vacant house in Detroit to cultivate approximately 400 shrimp from larvae, distribute the mature shrimp within the city, and demonstrate aquaculture as a viable way to address the scarcity of locally grown seafood, while simultaneously finding productive uses for vacant property in the city.
Annual Sustainability Guide, updated and produced by the Graham Sustainability Institute. The guide provides valuable tips and information related to the following core areas of sustainability on campus: Climate Action; Waste Prevention; Healthy Environments; and Community Awareness. Original content compiled by students in the "Sustainability & the Campus" course in 2010
As published in Environmental Management. Authors include Margaret Kalcic, Linda Prokopy, Jane Frankenberger, and Indrajeet Chaubey.
Watershed managers have largely embraced targeting of agricultural conservation as a way to manage strategically non-point source pollution from agricultural lands. However, while targeting of particular watersheds is not uncommon, targeting farms and fields within a specific watershed has lagged. In this work, the researchers employed a qualitative approach, using farmer interviews in west-central Indiana to better understand their views on targeting. Interviews focused on adoption of conservation practices on farmers’ lands and identified their views on targeting, disproportionality, and monetary incentives. Results show consistent support for the targeting approach, despite dramatic differences in farmers’ views of land stewardship, in their views about disproportionality of water quality impacts, and in their trust in conservation programming. While the theoretical concept of targeting was palatable to all participants, many raised concerns about its practical implementation, pointing to the need for flexibility when applying targeting solutions and revealing misgivings about the government agencies that perform targeting.
Co-authored by Joseph DePinto of LimnoTech and Margaret Kalcic of the U-M Water Center, this proceedings document describes a regional Great Lakes SWAT Modeling workshop hosted by the Water Center in March 2014. SWAT, which stands for Soil Water Assessment Tool, is a powerful model that allows users to determine the impacts of land management practices on water, sediment, and nutrient yields in agricultural watersheds. It is used frequently to answer land management questions and to inform nonpoint source pollution control decisions in agricultural watersheds such as Western Lake Erie, Green Bay, and Saginaw Bay.