Graham Sustainability Institute

Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan

Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan

Project Summary

There has been significant momentum behind natural gas extraction efforts in the United States, with many states embracing it as an opportunity to create jobs and foster economic strength. Natural gas extraction has also been championed as a way to move toward energy independence and a cleaner energy supply. First demonstrated in the 1940’s, hydraulic fracturing is now the predominant method used to extract natural gas in the U.S.

As domestic natural gas production has accelerated in recent years, however, the hydraulic fracturing process has come under increased public scrutiny. Concerns include perceived lack of transparency, chemical contamination, new techniques, water availability, waste water disposal, and impacts on ecosystems, human health, and surrounding communities.

The Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan Integrated Assessment (IA) is the result of a unique partnership involving several University of Michigan units, industry representatives, environmental organizations, and state regulators that formed in 2012 in order to examine the multiple aspects of this gas extraction technique with an emphasis on impacts and issues related to the State of Michigan.

The project was a partnership of U-M's Graham Sustainability Institute, Energy Institute, Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise, and Risk Science Center.

See:    IA Report Executive Summary   |     Full IA Report   |      IA Fact Sheet

Key Outcomes

The goal of the IA was to present information that expands and clarifies the scope of policy options in a way that allows a wide range of decision-makers to make choices based on their preferences and values. To do so, the IA does not  advocate for a single, recommended course of action. Rather, the IA presents information about the likely strengths, weakness, and outcomes of various courses of action in order to support informed decision making.
 
  • Upon release, the seven technical reports (available below) together formed the most comprehensive Michigan-focused resource on hydraulic fracturing. 
  • Drawing upon the information provided by the technical reports, additional peer-reviewed materials, stakeholder input, and expert peer review, the final report offers an analysis of Michigan-specific policy options for high-volume hydraulic fracturing with a focus on three key issues: chemical use, water resources, and public participation.
  • Praised by both state regulators and environmental organizations, the IA was also cited by Governor Snyder in a March 2015 special message for its usefulness for evaluating options for hydraulic fracturing:
"The [revised administrative] rules that took effect this week regarding high volume hydraulic fracturing were developed while key decision-makers from the state were participating in the first phase of an integrated assessment by the University of Michigan's Graham Institute. That helped us see an opportunity to strengthen our protection of water and give the public more information…The Graham Institute is now well into the second phase of its integrated assessment and the State will be among the many entities giving public comment to the researchers. The State looks forward to reading the final assessment and considering whether further rule changes or other improvements should be proposed."
—A Special Message from Michigan Governor Rick Snyder: Ensuring Affordable, Reliable, and Environmentally Protective Energy for Michigan's Future (PDF), March 13, 2015

Resources

Project Reports

 
Technical Reports

Report cover

Overview (160KB PDF)

Report cover

Technology: John Wilson and Johannes Schwank (1.7MB PDF)

Report cover

Geology/Hydrogeology: Brian Ellis (3MB PDF)

Report cover

Environment/Ecology: Allen Burton and Knute Nadelhoffer (3.5MB PDF)

Report cover

Public Health: Nil Basu (1.5MB PDF)

Report cover

Policy/Law: Sara Gosman (428KB PDF)

Report cover

Economics: Roland Zullo (628KB PDF)

Report cover

Public Perceptions: Kim Wolske and Andrew Hoffman (528KB PDF)

 

Download the technical reports (10.7MB ZIP)

IA Process

Advisory Committee

An advisory committee composed of representatives from corporate, government, and non-governmental organizations provided input and advice reflecting the view of key stakeholder groups and to ensure the scope of study is relevant to decision makers. Committee members also provided data and input throughout the process, but decisions regarding content of project analyses and reports were determined by the U-M Report and Integration Teams.

Valerie Brader – Senior Policy Advisory, Governor's Office of Strategic Policy, State of Michigan
James Clift – Policy Director, Michigan Environmental Council
John DeVries – Attorney, Mika Meyers Beckett & Jones; Michigan Oil and Gas Association
Hal Fitch – Director of Oil, Gas, and Minerals, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Gregory Fogle – Owner, Old Mission Energy; Michigan Oil and Gas Association
James Goodheart – Senior Policy Advisor, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Tammy Newcomb – Senior Water Policy Advisor, Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Grenetta Thomassey – Program Director, Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council
John Wilson – President, TMGEnergy, LLC
Public Comment & Peer Review

Stakeholder engagement was a key component of this integrated assessment (IA). The public was invited to provide input to inform the scope of the IA and comments on the draft IA report, and a webpage accepted comments throughout the entire IA project.  The comments received were reviewed, organized, and shared with the researchers and Advisory Committee to aid in developing the IA plan and revising the final IA report.

In addition, a panel of subject area experts representing multiple disciplines completed a peer review of the draft IA report to evaluate the scientific credibility, rigor, and integrity of the assessment. The Final Integrated Assessment Report was prepared after careful consideration of the feedback received from the peer review panel, advisory committee, and public comments.

Key points of engagement
  • March 5, 2013 – During development of the technical reports, the Graham Institute and Technical Report team members presented their report plans to decision makers and stakeholders in Lansing, Michigan. Watch the video, download the presentation (PDF), and review the event comment summary (PDF).
  • September 9, 2013 – A webinar after the technical reports were released included an overview of the project and question and answer session with several technical report authors. Watch the video, download the presentation (PDF),  and review the attendee question and response summary (PDF).
  • February 26, 2015 – Following release of the draft IA report, Graham held a public webinar with several authors of the draft report. Watch the video, download the presentation (PDF), and review the attendee question and response summary (PDF).

Related Links


For more information about the IA, please contact Maggie Allan at (734) 763-0749 or maallan@umich.edu.

The University of Michigan's Graham Sustainability Institute, Energy Institute and Risk Science Center provided $338,646 of project funding in 2011.